Alireza Saied, MD; Afshin Ahmadzadeh Heshmati, MD; Amir Reza Sadeghifar, MD; Ali Okati, MD
Abstract
Background: Tibia and femur fractures are among the most common fractures and intramedullary nailing is the standarad treatment. This study was performed to determine the best preoperative method for estimating the intramedullary nail length.
Methods: In a cross sectional study, 82 patients with tibia ...
Read More
Background: Tibia and femur fractures are among the most common fractures and intramedullary nailing is the standarad treatment. This study was performed to determine the best preoperative method for estimating the intramedullary nail length.
Methods: In a cross sectional study, 82 patients with tibia and 25 patients with femur shaft fracture were studied in a training center of Kerman-Iran. The estimated preoperative intramedullary nail length and the length of used nail at operation were compared. The measurment methods for femur fractures were greatrer trochanter-patella, greater trochanter-lateral epicondyle and olecranon-fithe finegr tip; and for tibia fractures were medial malleolus-tuberosity, intact leg radiogram and olecranon fifth metacarp were assessed. Data was assesed by statistical methods.
Results: Almost all of the examined methods showed "good" interobserver and intraobserver reliability. In femur fracture, the greater to patella method showed the best ICC (0.876) and the lowest SEM (0.777). In tibia fracture, best ICC (0.860) and the lowest SEM (0.602) were for medial malleolus tubercle method. For femur fractures, 64% of the measurements in greater to patella, 93% in olecranon fifth finger, 100% of greater to epicondyle methods; and for tibia fractures 40.9% in medial malleolus tubercle, 37.3% of olecranon metacarp and 65.06% of radiogram method were larger than the nail used at operation.
Conclusions: The best method for estimation of nial length was medial malleolus to tuberosity for tibia fractures, and greater to patella method for femur fractures; however none of the examined methods was found completely suitable.
Alireza Saied, MD; Mohammadreza Baneshi, PhD; Afshin Heshmaty, MD; Amir Reza Sadeghifar, MD; Saman Ghiassi; Ali Okati, MD
Abstract
Background: There have been investigations on the effect of absence or presence of Palmaris longus tendon on pinch and grip strength of the hand. In the same way the effect of presence of fifth superficial flexor digitorum on grip strength of the hand has been investigated. The aim of the present study ...
Read More
Background: There have been investigations on the effect of absence or presence of Palmaris longus tendon on pinch and grip strength of the hand. In the same way the effect of presence of fifth superficial flexor digitorum on grip strength of the hand has been investigated. The aim of the present study was to assess the combined effect of these anatomical variations on pinch and grip strength.
Methods: In a cross sectional study, 1046 hands in 523 volunteers were enrolled. Each hand was assessed for the presence or absence of palmaris longus tendon and also variations of fifth superficial flexor digitorum function. Then the grip and pinch power of the hands were measured with Jammar Dynamometer.
Results: Presence or absence of Palmaris longus had no effect on grip strength of the individuals. In the same way, variations of fifth superficial flexor digitorum function had no effect on the grip and pinch strengths. But the positive and statistically significant effect of presence of palmaris longus on pinch strength (25.38 in hands with palmaris present v/s 24.43 in hands without it) was evident (p < /em>=.03). Grip and pinch powers were higher in men compared to women (p < /em><.0001) and in right compared to left hands (p < /em>=.013).
Conclusions: Based upon the findings of the present study, it seems that absence of palmaris longus tendon is associated with a reduction in pinch strength, but has no effect on grip strength and the variations of fifth superficial flexor digitorum have no effect on pinch and grip strengths.
